Boston Book Blitz – Pt. 23: An Encounter with Milan Kundera

Even before the first page of “Encounter,” Czech-French author/critic Milan Kundera lays out his book’s roadmap. These signposts come in the fragment of a larger line. Kundera writes:

“…an encounter with my reflections and my recollections, my old themes (existential and asethetic) and my old lives…”

What follows the quotation is exactly that. Some segments are pieces he wrote several decades ago. Others were written in the present. One splices his old work, not with revisions, but instead with his current thoughts on the same topic. A few chapters are more long form essays, sometimes broken up thematically, sometimes not. Throughout it all, we, the reader are encountering great works of art, iconic artists, historic social movements, and European history spanning several centuries through through Kundera’s perspective.

Encounter by Milan Kundera

Its not until nearly page 100 of “Encounter,” when writing about Martinique and the island’s literary community’s response to movements in the 1940’s does Kundera explicitly state what an encounter is. He writes, “Not a social relation, not a friendship, not even an alliance: an encounter which is to say a spark, a lightning flash; random chance.”

“Encounter” shares similarities with the previously reviewed “Changing My Mind” by Zadie Smith and “The Possessed…” by Elif Batuman in that all three books examine the meaning of literary works and writers who have influenced each author. With Kundera, however, most of these works get a few pages at most. It is the rare book to have a fully fleshed out chapter. Smith and Batuman give us the plot and all the characters before jumping into the analysis. Kundera is giving us “a lightning flash” with each work instead of a “friendship.” Kundera is interested in telling us his opinion of the work and artist.

The flipside of these brief encounters with writers, books, artists, paintings, political movements, composers, and the whole lot of folks and ideas that are crammed into the book is that Kundera presumes his readers know whom and what he is writing about. This goes back to a subject Zadie Smith discussed: the roles of the reader and writer. Being uneducated in the ways of Roland Barthes, who gets name dropped as part of an erudite joke in “Encounter,” I came away from this book feeling as if Kundera’s intention wasn’t to educate the uninformed, but instead to, at the age of 80 at the time of publication, let the world know where he stands on these matters.

The Unbearable Lightness of Being....Milan Kundera

As much as Kundera is presumably addressing a more educated and enlightened circle, his political mindset, as liberal as it may be, ends up being so very wrong when writing about NATO’s actions in Serbia. In the book’s final character, where Kundera addresses Malaparte’s two novels on World War II in Italy, he mentions NATO’s military action in Serbia and Kosovo. Kundera’s argument is that the Europe of the second half of 20th Century is a “New Europe.” It is a place born out of the defeat of an entire continent as it was both liberated and occupied at the same time. Kundera notes that there is one exception. He writes, ” Which is why Serb cities had to be bombarded for many long weeks in 1999: in order to impose, a posteriori, the “vanquished’ status on even that part of Europe.”

I could write how Kundera seems silly when describing NATO’s horribly late reaction to the actions of Milosevic and the Serbian government as an effort to finish off the vanquishing of Europe some fifty years after it began. The funny thing is I don’t have to since Kundera himself did it earlier in the book. In an earlier “encounter,” he writes about Phillip Roth’s use of sex in the novel as a development in our history. Kundera’s analysis is the counterpoint to his bombing claim.

“The acceleration of history has profoundly transformed individual lives that, in centuries past, used to proceed from birth to death within a single historical period; today a life straddles two such periods, sometimes more. Whereas history used to advance far more slowly than human life, nowadays, it is history that moves fast, it tears ahead, it slips from a man’s grasp, and the continuity , the identity, of a life is in danger of cracking apart.”

Kundera’s wrongness stems less from a disregard for the lives of those in Kosovo, but from the fact that today’s history has slipped from his grasp. It is an irony that a critic like Kundera would appreciate, if he could see it.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Boston Book Blitz – Pt. 23: An Encounter with Milan Kundera”

    1. Thanks for taking the time to read the post. It would be great if you could be more specific about my wrong perspective. Is that about my critique of his Balkan arguments? More importantly, how can any one perspective be the “true” perspective? The be all end all of perspectives, if you will.

      1. Ferris, Kundera is right when writing about Balkans. I agree with him. People in the West hear about situation in Serbia and Kosovo only in news and since they don’t know much, or nothing about history of that part of the world, (which is natural thing, why would they know?) they are easy to manipulate through media. Yugoslavia needed to break, they were political, economical and military treat,(all Communist countries broke at about the same time), Serbia as Russian ally needed to break , too , Kosovo needed independence from Serbia in order to make US and NATO bases, (among other things), which were not allowed by Serbs etc. etc. so US and NATO, or EU, or whatever decided to forget about UN conventions,(they still exist, but what for?), destroy one sovereign country, (Serbia), provoke wars, (war always has terrible consequences and casualties on both sides, Serbs where killed in thousands, too) and all the NATO governments needed to justify their actions against Serbia, (illegal actions!!!, if you know the law,) with propaganda against Milosevic and Serbia, which continues, because the Kosovo issue is not yet finished. That’s what Kundera is probably thinking of when writing about Europe and NATO and Serbia. Europe is humiliating its own child, a country that was in both great wars a hero country, with hero soldiers with enormous casualties, country on the side of good guys, against Austrian-Hungarians, against NAZI Germany, a country that never conquered, always defended itself.
        Europe is on knees.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s