Debate One For The Gipper! A Debate Night Diary

The first presidential debate I remember watching is the one where then-President George Bush looked at his watch in the midst of an answer by Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton. The first debate where I felt the pangs of a staffer was when Bob Dole used his intro to tell viewers the score of the Padres-Cardinal playoff game. With no horse in the 2012 Republican presidential primary, I decided to keep a diary/live blog of this evening’s debate at the Ronald Reagan Library. So, lots of love for the Gipper!

7:52pm – Looks like the sound crew is crossing the background of the pre-debate Politico show. With so many debates in this month, it gets me wondering, are these guys staying on the road. Are they campaign roadies? Do you think they have their own dynamic? Like Romney’s guys is on a blue tooth 24/7, Cain’s guy hates pizza, and Gingrich’s roadie – ha, just kidding, its Newt.

7:54 – The sound was way off the video. Like poorly dubbed movie bad. I’m sure this will lead to at least one or two moments where Mitt Romney will be possessed by the voice of Rick Perry during the debate.

Take That Millard Fillmore Presidential Book Annex - Via thegraduates.org

7:56 – No matter what your thoughts are on Reagan as a president, kudos to the Reagan library for getting Air Force one in their facility. Talk about presidential. Maybe the debate should be held in the plane?

8:01 – After seeing some junior production staff on camera and a green screen with no sound in the minutes leading up to to the debate, switch over to MSNBC. Way better. Politico may win the morning, but they have lost this evening.

8:02 – Rick Perry reminds me of Governor Ritchie from West Wing. Will I be validated? Will he answer a question by saying, “[Insert issue here], boy, I don’t know”? Perry seems kind of jittery in his first answer. Big stage, first time in the fire. No mess-up though and he managed to stay on message though.

8:05 – Romney says if he was a career politician, he wouldn’t be running for president. Is it because he finally checked out his winning percentage when it comes to campaigns? Nope, it would be due to the fact that he wouldn’t have lived in the real economy.  Ron Paul would like that fake economy, I hear there is a gold standard.

8:07 – Man, Brian Williams really wants Romney v. Perry to be the title fight. Perry lands the jab but still real shakey on the first zinger. He sure did land that Dukakis jab. Congrats to all those who had Dukakis in your Drinking Game’s “Pick-A-Liberal-Stereotype From the 80′s” pool.

8:10 – Hey guys! Rick Santorum has a plan. He really likes it and wants some Democrats to like it too! It just a bunch of tax cuts. Man, what a plan tease.

8:11 – Herman Cain’s tax code plan sounds like a pizza deal. 9-9-9.  Or those long distance code commercials before we all had cell phones.

8:12 – Huntsman had me until he said Ronald Reagan flew Air Force One. Got me back with his solid argument on China and ability to drive home the answer. Let’s see what happens when he get something not in his wheelhouse. Not like any of these other candidates was an ambassador to China or anything.

8:14 – Rick Santorum can’t stop nodding during Michele Bachmann’s answer on Obamacare. God, I hope Brian Williams gives Santorum’s note to her during Study Hall. Bachmann crazy embraces the argument that every job lost or not created is because of ObamaCare. Take that for what it is worth.

Welcome to the Jungle Ron Paul, we got fun and games and some really gross stuff - Via Capital Century

8:16 – Wouldn’t Ron Paul would be the most popular curmudgeonly economics professor at the University of Chicago? He seems a lot like the libertarian version of this economic professor I had in college, minus the smelling of whiskey part. More importantly, Brian Williams asks Rep. Paul about regulating the drug industry after he gets nowhere on car safety and air traffic controllers. The gist of Paul’s answer is that the lobbyists run amok and foul up the system so what point is there in the government trying. And that market will determine who is safe and not. Seems very defeatest and intellectually dishonest. Lax ethics and lobbying laws create the situation and folks like Paul throw up their hands and say, “See, I told you, the government shouldn’t be involved.”

8:19 – How bout that? Newt Gingrich had us all there for a second, sounding like a real candidate until he gets after Obama for being all about class warfare. I’m sure that message is going over well in Hawaii!

8:20 – Rick Perry voluntarily said individual mandates do not work in this country? Could this be an unforced error at some point? Somebody is going to attach that to other mandates, right?

8:21 – Romney just said 100% of people are covered by Obamacare. Somebody better tell my employer they don’t need to provide my coverage.

8:22 – Perry is asked why his state was dead last in health coverage. His response was to give block grants to the state to allow for innovation on the state level. No one is calling these types of answers out. Other states, dealing with the same restrictions as Texas, did better than the Lone Star State. Why should a state that ranks dead last be trusted with the job of innovating when they are the last of the pack. Perry’s nerves haven’t gone away. Or is this just how he sounds when he is debating?

8:25 – Huntsman’s response to health care could have been stronger. Waited too long to go after Romney. If you’ve got a zinger, got it make sure it comes first or you are under time when you are going to throw it on the table.

8:26 – Bachmann will not only bring gas down to $2 a gallon, she is going to elect 13 more Republican senators. Would love for Bachmann to explain how ObamaCare is socialized medicine since you know, there is no government option!

Newt's efforts to divorce climate change were ultimately unsuccessful - Via FreeRepublic

8:27 – Gingrich goes after the moderator for highlighting real disagreement between Romney and Perry. Wow! Gingrich made the moderators not only the enemy but a wing of Obama for America. Is this the same guy who shared a counch with Nancy Pelosi for an ad about climate change?

8:28 – Herman Cain also against individual mandate – No one cares.

8:31 – Rick Santorum seems deeply passionate about the issue of poverty and welfare and human dignity. Talks about how poverty was its lowest in 2001. Wonder who took over that year. Better chance of Mark Foley getting mentioned approvingly in this debate I guess.

8:32 – Rick Perry just referred to Santorum as the other fellow or something similar. Perry platitudes on the economy question. God, he is either having an off night or this is his typical performance. Either way, if he makes it into the general election, those debates are going to epic. They should be scheduled on Friday or Saturday nights so folks don’t have to call in sick due to drinking games gone awry.

8:34 – Twitter questions. The plebians speak! 140 characters for you!

8:34 – The Marcellus Shale according to Romney could be done by Obama. Actually, NY is in control of that. Man, Romney is doing a lot of things in Day 1. Wonder if he realizes there is a lot of pro forma stuff to go through. Like W-2 and getting a work buddy.

8:35 – Bachmann claims gas was $1.79 when Obama came into office. I’m sure there was no context like it being winter or anything else to off-set that cherry picked piece of information.

Phone break!! I missed 12 minutes of the debate. Oh well, I’d rather talk to my girlfriend. This is just a civic duty for all five of my readers – all of whom probably watched the debate on a TV!

The Pride of Kenosha, Wisconsin!

8:49 -  I come back and Rick Perry is saying that social security is a ponzi scheme. Wow! Would have been impressed if he called it a Fonzi Scheme! Has this post jumped the shark yet?

8:50 – Mitt Romney is the candidate who will save Social Security. Will Perry force Romney to be the adult front-runner in the room. If Perry and Romney keep mixing it up on this issue, that looks like it will happen by default, but what a boring figurative fight that would be. Heads-up, when they ask about COLA, they ain’t talking about Pepsi or Coke.

8:51 – Rick Perry on social security sounds like the guy who heard some stuff on the radio or in USA Today and believes all of it validates what he believes.

8:52 – Herman Cain wants to save Social Security by embracing the Chilean model which allows young folks to keep their money out of the system. In America, we call that killing social security by defunding it.

8:54 – Bachmann comes out against government mandating parents to inoculate children. Look, maybe there is some gray area in the way Texas went about the HPV debate and that will allow other candidates to score points off of Perry, but coming out against all inoculations is dangerous. The reckless claims of Jenny McCarthy and her ilk have led to a re-emergence of polio. Is Bachmann saying we should run the risk of having kids be exposed to TB, measles, mumps, rubella, and polio? Get real.

8:56 – Always err on the side of saving lives. Probably Perry’s best line so far tonight.

8:58 – Romney handles the Perry/HPV question nicely compared to the other candidates. The problem with Romney in these debates is that he always seems so uncomfortable even when what he is saying sounds good. Is it because he has had so many different positions on these issues? Or is there something else?

8:59 – Ron Paul just seems like an old grandpa at Thanksgiving when it comes to airport security. “They gettin’ sexual at the airport!” Not really a quote. Paul says the airlines should provide security. This is a legitimate question, but who was providing it before TSA and DHS? Was it the market place? My experience with the free market and security guards leaves me to believe that most places go for the cheapest option out there. Not to say TSA is doing a great job, but lets be honest on all fronts here.

9:03 – Ron Paul seems uber shocked that Herman Cain agrees with him.

9:04 – Huntsman comes out against the fortress security mentality that developed post-9/11. Finally! This is a true wedge issue. Something that will appeal to Ds, Rs, and independents.  And then he pivots to unemployment ably. Solid answer.

9:06 – Newt Gingrich likes Barack Obama’s position on charter schools. Charter schools are part of class warfare. Newt Gingrich is a class warrior (during school hours only!) See how I did that?!

9:08 – Perry wants a two part system when it comes to immigration. Security and then talking about those who are here and fixing the immigration system. Right, because these debates operate in a two part system. Well, sort of, I guess, but seems like an easy way to get around saying something impolitic.

9:09 – Romney wants a fence. Even though he goes on to say fences won’t work. Right on employers who hire illegal immigrants are a magnet. Wrong on penalizing the children of parents who committed the crime of crossing the border illegally, especially to children who were born here and are citizens by birth. No amnesty from Romney!

9:11 – The thing about Newt Gingrich is that when he talks about the past, he sounds logical. When he talks about threats to America or Obama he is a loon. Reminds me of the Batman villain, Two-Face.

9:13 – Santorum asked about the 11 million who are here. Says he’ll talk about it later. Um, you are running for president. You should answer that now.

9:14 – Bachmann’s answers get loopier and loopier. When asked about the border, she says failing to erect a fence means we are surrendering our sovereignty to narco-terrorists in Mexico. First off, she is terror mongering. Second, these folks are drug kings, not narco-terrorists. They are business man who look at the bottom line. Our War on Drugs helps them. Only Ron Paul, Gary Johnson, and maybe Jon Huntsman are willing to admit that.

9:17 – Come on Huntsman! First you bring up Zombie Reagan, referring to him as if Reagan was at the debate, and then talk about fixing the legal immigration system and pointing out the boom in Vancouver, British Columbia. Talk about walking a tight rope.

9:18 – Ron Paul’s wheelhouse – Border and Real ID cards and this fence business. He saw the hanging curve coming down the pipe and swung too hard. Ends up closing on the fence will also keep enterpreneurs and the rich in. Right, because they are all fleeing to Ciudad Juarez right now. Not one of these candidates said anything about how putting the federal government on the border is an expansion of the federal government. Man, the US is just like Hotel California.

9:22 – Campaigns asked NBC/Politico for no lightning round. Instead just get some thunder.

Mitt Romney Supports Any Tea Party With Earl Grey - Via Country Living

9:23 – Mitt Romney is for the Tea Party if it is for what he stands for. Romney’s most honest answer.

9:25 – After candidates are asked if they would change their previous answer on tax cuts/revenue enhancements in a budget deal, Bachmman claims Reagan would join them. Really? On taxes? Safe to say she is no longer a serious challenger. Not even a Huckabee level threat anymore to be honest, unless Perry folds like a cheap suit.

9:26 – Man, I may disagree with Huntsman but I like his messaging.

9:27 – Huntsman talks about nation building at home. He sounds like Bernie Sanders. Mentions that Afghanistan is an asymmetrical counter-terror effort. He wants to get the nation’s core fixed. Talk about a brainy answer. If Huntsman can find a way to get into the general election, Obama has to be worried about that match-up.

9:28 – Romney just pales in comparison to Huntsman. I know everybody thought it was going to be Perry that Romney needs to worry about, but I think it will be Huntsman. Romney is not going to compete for Perry’s votes. Huntsman could take from Romney. He doesn’t just look like the adult in the room, Huntsman sounds like the adult in the room.

9:29 – Rick Perry approves Obama’s efforts with Osama Bin Ladin. And then says Keynesian economics is dead. Did Seal Team 6 kill that too? Seriously, though, Perry just seems hesitant and unsure throughout this entire debate. It gets to the point where you start to wonder if there is any room for growth here or is this all that there is. Don’t forget, he dodged debates in the general election in 2010.

9:30 – Perry says Americans don’t want to see adventurisms in military. He won’t say what an example of that is. It is an either or deal, right? Afghanistan or Iraq? Sounds a lot like to Iraq to me.

9:31 – Bachmann’s sense of geography and International Relations makes Ollie North look like a Rhodes Scholar. First, she says Obama has weakened the military. Her argument: there are calls for military budget cuts. So, Republicans say efficiency can come to other parts of the government by budget cuts through trimming the fat. When it comes to DOD, that is a non-starter. Give me a break. It gets even better when she says Obama has weakened Israel against a potentially nuclear Iran because of the president’s call for Israel to go back to the 1967 borders. Besides her willful misrepresentation of Obama’s Israel policy, the two have little to nothing in relation. Bachmann is a mighty wind filled with meaninglessness

9:34 – I mentioned to a friend earlier this evening that I think our political parties are dure for a realignment, mostly from the center, center-right and right. One of the main areas will be on foreign policy. The right diverges greatly. You have the isolationist view point represented by Bachmann and then the theology infused neo-con perspective brought to you by Santorum. Both slam the president but from very very different perspectives.

9:36 – Huntsman gets asked about his comments calling some folks in the Republican party cranks and crazies. He parries it pretty well.

9:37 – Perry seems so wholly unprepared. Compared to Huntsman, he seems to be winging it 100 percent.

9:38 – Would be interested in why Perry’s state lowed those toxin levels and how they did it.

9:39 – Bachmann just claimed Obama is following a political agenda, not a scientific agenda on environmental issues. All after she mentions he rejected increased EPA standards. She can’t even get her attack lines straight. Call Marcus!

9:40 – Gingrich and Bachmann have brought up the money infused into the economy by unleashing completely the energy industry. No mention of where these studies are from or how much the increases in production would hurt our health, cost us in medical bills and other consequence costs.

9:42 – Romney implies that people should support our war effort by taxes. I would like to know if that means he is opposed to the Bush Tax Cuts.

9:43 – Everybody loves bashing Bernanke, but it seems like folks forget he was a Bush appointee

9:44 – In a question to Rick Perry, 234 folks have been executed in Texas during your governorship, says Brian Williams. The crowd applauds. Sad.

9:44 – Rick Perry thinks all executed prisoners were guilty. The most damning example of his wrongness is here.

9:46 – Herman Cain says his tax plan would level the playing field for all businesses. I guess part of the 9-9-9 deal is if you don’t get your tax break in 30 minutes, you get…..?

9:48 – Ron Paul is opposed to the mandates. At least the Republicans are opposed to mandates and Man Dates too.

9:49 – The market takes care of people. Take a look at 2007, Mister Paul.

So the only super serious candidates with a shot of winning are Mitt Romney, Rick Perry, and Jon Huntsman. Romney continues to look like central casting’s presidential stereotype, but the only time he sounds enthusiastic is when he is trying to reign in the discussion from going off the rails and with Huntsman around, he gets less opportunities to do that. Perry, for all his bluster, looked and sounded like the guy who crammed before the test and wasn’t entirely comfortable. Previous first debates from him have been equally lackluster. In the past, his follow up debates have been better, but there is one difference between now and then. He isn’t the incumbent anymore. Huntsman went after the status quo without rabidly going after Obama. He sounded mature, he bantered with Romney and Perry while holding off some sort of sinus infection. The last time someone in Utah handled a sinus infection this well in a clutch situation, they were pushing off of Byron Russell before making the winning shot.

The T-Paw Legacy

Tim Pawlenty Wants You (GOP Primary Voters) to Want Him - Via Think Progress

This past week, Walter Shapiro’s profile of Republican presidential candidate and former Minnesota governor Tim Pawlenty appeared entitled,”The Tragedy of Tim Pawlenty: He Did Everything Right. And That Was the Problem” appeared
in The New Republic.

Shapiro spent the month of June following Pawlenty on the trail, interviewing the candidate and his friends and former colleagues. Put kindly, June was not a good month for Pawlenty. His performance at the first Republican debate in New Hampshire was panned by most, his fundraising numbers were anemic, and he was overtaken as the alternative to Mitt Romney by Rep. Michele Bachmann, a fellow Minnesotan.

The profile covers those developments, adding to it an analysis of his performance on the stump in the very different environments of Iowa and New Hampshire, his feelings about Bachmann’s rise, and the story of his blue-collar upbringing in South St. Paul.

Throughout the piece, Shapiro returns to the thesis that Pawlenty’s success in politics, the success that made him a potential running mate for John McCain in 2008 and a candidate this year, is rooted in his habit of constantly planning and micro-managing.

One of these is not like the others - Via MinnPost.com

For me, the two biggest takeaways from this profile come from Pawlenty’s flirtation with environmentalism and his legacy as governor.

First, Shapiro quotes directly from Governor Pawlenty’s the first State of the State address of his second term. Pawlenty told legislators, “Minnesota can’t reverse global climate change by ourselves. But we can do our part and help lead the way. Our energy plan will significantly reduce the amount of carbon we put in the atmosphere. I look forward to working with the Democrats and Republicans to pass and sign comprehensive historic renewable energy legislation this year.”

Indeed, it was impressive. His green agenda included cap-and-trade provisions and for Minnesota to get a quarter of its electricity from wind and solar power by 2025. He had embraced the fight against global warming so much that he was even considering a trip to the North Pole.

Then came the previously mentioned consideration for the VP-slot on the McCain campaign. The trip was shelved and the green agenda became less prominent. In interviews for the article, Pawlenty walked back his environmentalist streak. Does it make a difference if he is still an environmentalist and is only going silent to make it through the Republican primary? Or, following the GOP’s defeat across the country in 2006, did Pawlenty see environmentalism as a way to make him more attractive to independent and Democratic voters? Either way, it shows that while he is no Mitt Romney, his flip-flopping is problematic.  Unlike Romney, who switched beliefs in an effort to win the Republican nomination, Pawlenty was willing to sell out his nascent green streak for a shot at being a candidate for vice-president.

Speaking of Romney, University of Minnesota political Larry Jacobs points out something worrisome about Tim Pawlenty’s record as governor. Says Jacob, “What is the signature issue of the Pawlenty administration? You would have to say its negative. It’s what he prevented. But what did Pawlenty create?”

The answer is nothing. Jacobs concludes, “And that’s disappointing, because the guy is bright. In terms of brain power, he’s unusual.” The negative creation that Jacobs refers to is his pledge not to raise taxes. His ability to hold the line on taxes, sort of, is his claim to fame.

Minnesota: The Land of GOP Candidates for President - Via the Daily News

Shouldn’t a presidential candidate have more of a vision for office than just holding the line on taxes? Past Republican presidents who have served as governors level have come to the White House with track records on other issues. And now as a nation, we face serious issues that whoever is sworn in as President on January 20, 2013 will face where not raising taxes isn’t an answer that fits. Aging infrastructure, public education, the cost of higher education, border safety (Hey, Minnesota borders Canada), and environmental issues. Where does he stand on these issues? Do they matter to him? Or he is some sort of tax-bot?

Maybe one bad month is the harbinger of what the rest of the Pawlenty campaign will be. Poorly funded, burdened by a candidate who struggles to connect with voters, and overshadowed by his better financed and more personable opponents. But, like John Kerry and John McCain before him, he could recover in time to finish competitively in the Iowa caucuses (Kerry, not McCain), and find a way to hold off Bachmann and make it a head-to-head fight against Romney. If that were to happen, people will start looking seriously at his record as governor. And from this profile, it looks pretty empty.

Howard Kurtz Is Easily Impressed by Mitt Romney

A few weeks ago, the Republican candidates for president came together for two hours on a Monday night for the first presidential debate of the 2012 cycle in New Hampshire. The brief summary of what transpired goes as this: Tim Pawlenty was unimpressive (blowing off prep for bowling won’t happen again), Mitt Romney won the debate, Michelle Bachmann got a lot of applause, Ron Paul got his libertarian on, and Newt Gingrich and Herman Cain duked it out in the fight for the most ridiculous comment.

Now that it is officially summer, the candidates and media turn their attention to Iowa. Home of the first in the nation January caucuses, as well as the Ames Straw Poll in August, most serious candidates try to visit as many county fairs, shake as many hands, and tirelessly criss-cross the state.

Howard Kurtz Writes Stuff Sometimes - Via Washington City Paper

While the Ames Straw Poll and the quarterly fundraising totals are campaign stories that come down the pipe at scheduled intervals, there is a news vacuum of sorts in the coming months that puts some journalists in a bind. They have to switch from reporting to analysis and for one Howard Kurtz, that creates some problems.

This past weekend on The Daily Beast, Kurtz’s article, “Mitt Romney for President 2012: Boring Campaign May Be Genius.” In a cycle where candidates (in name or action) like Gingrich, Palin, Bachmann, and Cain have gotten coverage and in some cases traction from making off-the-wall comments, there very well could be room for a Republican candidate to run on policy, highlighting the shortcomings of the Obama administration and said candidate’s plans to right the economy and solve other issues.

Maybe Kurtz has forgotten what boring means, because the article he writes doesn’t describe Mitt Romney as a boring candidate, it describes a Mitt Romney who is running a Rose Garden strategy campaign as a challenger. Romney isn’t running as a policy wonk, he is the guy who stays away from the press to raise money. Only periodically does he make retail appearances or talk to the press, typically conservative outlets or faux-journalists like Piers Morgan (“Mitt Romney, you’ve got talent!”)

Kurtz’s article is written in the style of a Rudy Giuliani presidential campaign. Superficial, quickly brushes past serious negatives, and eager to accept any information that will fit pre-established beliefs.

Mitt Romney Approves This Article - Via Triplepundit.com

Lets start with superficial. For all intents and purposes, Kurtz hands Romney the Republican nomination. Yes, of all the candidates in the GOP field, Romney is closest to Central Casting’s image of a president, and he turned in a solid performance at the New Hampshire debate earlier this month. But this is June. There are seven months until the Iowa Caucuses and more than a year until the Republican convention in St. Petersburg. A lot can happen in a year. Romney has been through this before, but so had John Edwards in 2008 and he fared no better. Romney has a lot of competition to the right of the him, to the Libertarian of him, and for his own type of voter (Mormon or centrist or Mormon centrist) from former Utah Governor Jon Huntsman Jr.

How about those serious negatives since there are a whole lot Howard Kurtz is sweeping under the rug. First, Romney’s decision to avoid the press spotlight means the only thing being written about him are “recycled gems” about his vulnerabilities and flip flops. These include, but are not limited to, his previous support of gay rights, abortion rights, and as his Republican opponent Tim Pawlenty attacked him for, Obamney Care. Yes, Mitt Romney was the governor of Massachusetts when he helped secure legislation that mandated all citizens of the state have health insurance.

With little more than a peep on these negatives from the campaign, Kurtz doesn’t examine how these factual attacks on Romney going unrefuted will affect Republican voters opinion of him during the primary season. But don’t worry about Mitt, he’s got some killer campaign plans that will get Obama next fall.

Running For President? Kindly Check Your Shame at the Door.

Kurtz accepts the logic of those plans eagerly. Romney’s strategists want their candidate to focus on fixing the economy. Stuart Stevens, Romney’s media adviser, tells Kurtz that Romney had no intention of running for the White House “until the economy plunged into a deep recession.” [Kurtz's words, not a direct quote from Stevens.] Right, the recession that began in December of 2007 and ended in June of 2009. A 19 month recession, of which, 14 months occurred during the Bush Administration. You know what does fall in that time span? November 5 – the morning after Obama beat McCain. That is when Romney decided to run, yet Kurtz accepts this implied Obama is responsible for the recession argument at face value.

The effectiveness of the strategy also goes unexamined. Kurtz explains that the Romney camp has posted online videos about the “Obama Misery Index,” while the candidate focuses on 9 percent unemployment with periodic retail appearance and sometimes engagement with the press. While Kurtz does acknolwedge that a Romney appearance in Florida (Giuliani style!) was dogged by a joke about Romney being unemployed too, he ignores how Romney committed an unforced error when that quip became a story of its own. Kurtz either ignores or is unaware that a Romney “Obama Misery Index” video features a recent college grad who talks about being out of work, despite the fact that the guy has a job. It is not that there aren’t folks who can’t find work, it is that the Romney campaign was too lazy to find one of them and instead chose a Republican volunteer for the gig. As of yet, Romney’s job plan sounds like it is a job plan for one: him.

Mitt Romney is Serious About This President Thing. He Wrote a Book About It! - Via Frumforum.com.

All of this could be a little more forgivable, or at least less aggravating, if this was a profile piece, not an article fronting as legitimate analysis. However, Kurtz sums up his argument with a recent ABC News poll that has Romney leading Obama 49 to 46, and pacing his other Republican rivals when they go head-to-head against the president. That argument should make you want to shout: POST HOC ERGO PROPTER HOC! Just because the poll happened after the campaign implemented their jobs strategy does not mean it is the reason Romney has a three point lead. Maybe it has something to do with the fact that Romney is a known commodity having run in 2008. And all his other declared rivals are far less well known. And while we are at it, can we agree to a moratorium on citing national polls more than a year and a half before the election as a solid barometer of anything when a candidate still has to go through primary season? Oh wait, the most recent poll in Iowa has Romney and Bachmann all tied up, which would torpedo Kurtz’s argument that he could defeat her.

Kurtz admits the Romney avoidance plan has an expiration date come the fall when the race heats up and his rivals are “fully engaged.” Kurtz compares this time of the campaign season to spring training. I’ve got to disagree with him wholeheartedly here. These summer days are the regular season. It is a 162 game season, including the dog days of summer. Those campaigns that make it as far as the late fall and survive through winter caucuses and primaries are duking it out in the playoffs. Spring training is over and Romney’s strategy may help him in the short term, but it will hurt him in the long run.

You know who knows this? Real reporters. Yesterday’s First Read placed the candidate’s activities in Iowa as their first story. President Obama was there giving a speech on manufacturing, Sarah Palin was there for the premiere of the documentary on her time as governor of Alaska, and Michele Bachmann announced her candidacy in Waterloo, Iowa over this past Monday. By not making Iowa a priority now – Romney is skipping the Ames Straw Poll – there is a serious chance, he could hurt his chances of picking it up if he becomes the Republican nominee next year. And unlike Kurtz’s national poll loving, First Read explains how any Republican nominee will most likely need two of three states of Iowa, Ohio, and Wisconsin to unseat President Obama.

You aren’t going to find that type of reporting in Kurtz’s article because it is a puff piece parading as serious analysis.